The U.S. preclinical CRO market size was valued at USD 3.19 billion in 2023 and is projected to surpass around USD 6.39 billion by 2033, registering a CAGR of 7.2% over the forecast period of 2024 to 2033.
The rising trend of outsourcing and the increasing focus of life science companies on their core competencies is driving the market growth. In addition, collaborations of biopharmaceutical companies with CROs are expected to positively impact the U.S. market for preclinical CRO. In August 2023, Crown Bioscience, a JSR Life Sciences company, announced its collaborative efforts with HanX Biopharmaceutical Co., Ltd., involving the use of a diverse range of preclinical modeling techniques for supporting the successful FDA Investigational New Drug (IND) application, have been published in Scientific Reports.
One of the primary drivers of outsourcing is that biopharmaceutical & life sciences companies do not have to make high capital investments for specific operations. Companies can outsource their noncore functions to CROs so that they can focus on their core operations, thereby increasing their productivity and operational efficiency. Currently, there is a notable trend of outsourcing preclinical testing functions to CROs or preclinical service providers in nations to reduce cost and increase focus on core R&D functions. This is especially common among small- and midsized life science companies that do not have an established R&D facility. These companies outsource preclinical testing activities to small- and midsized CROs to focus more on the clinical drug development process.
As personalized medicine is growing and the outdated one-size-fits-all model fades, there is a rising emphasis on making clinical trials more accessible and less taxing for patients. In response, technology has emerged as a crucial component in this domain. CROs are leading in adopting cutting-edge technologies and tools. This proactive approach not only helps them stay competitive but also enables them to provide clients with a comprehensive range of solutions.
Key companies are adopting several strategic technologies to expand their product reach in the market. For instance, in December 2023, Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL) formed a partnership with CELLphenomics through a mutual agreement. This collaboration will grant clients of Charles River access to CELLphenomics' exclusive 3D tumor model platform, PD3D. Consequently, Charles River's range of 3D in vitro testing services will expand, allowing for enhanced optimization of oncological strategies tailored to its clientele. This advancement is expected to significantly boost the company's Discovery and Safety Assessment (DSA) segment.
Personalized medicine and advanced therapeutics often involve highly specialized treatments tailored to individual patients or specific genetic profiles. This complexity requires extensive preclinical research to understand the mechanisms of action, safety profiles, and efficacy of these treatments. As a result, pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies increasingly rely on preclinical CROs to efficiently conduct these specialized studies.
Report Attribute | Details |
Market Size in 2024 | USD 3.42 Billion |
Market Size by 2033 | USD 6.39 Billion |
Growth Rate From 2024 to 2033 | CAGR of 7.2% |
Base Year | 2023 |
Forecast Period | 2024 to 2033 |
Segments Covered | Service, model type, technology, end-use, state |
Market Analysis (Terms Used) | Value (US$ Million/Billion) or (Volume/Units) |
Report Coverage | Revenue forecast, company ranking, competitive landscape, growth factors, and trends |
Key Companies Profiled | Laboratory Corporation of America; Lonza; WuXi AppTec, Inc.; Eurofins Scientific SE; Intertek Group plc; Medpace Holdings, Inc.; Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.; SGA SA; Pharmaceutical Product Development, Inc. (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.); ICON plc; CROWN bioscience |
The discovery research segment dominated the market with a revenue share of 29.16% in 2023. This can be attributed to the rising outsourcing trends among pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies seeking to reduce costs and accelerate drug development. With increasing R&D expenditure, companies are relying on CROs’ specialized expertise in areas such as target identification and lead optimization. The flexibility and scalability offered by CROs, coupled with technological advancements, enable efficient and effective early-stage drug discovery. Furthermore, stringent regulatory requirements drive demand for high-quality preclinical research services provided by CROs to ensure the safety and efficacy of potential drug candidates. These factors collectively contribute to significant growth in discovery research services within the global preclinical CRO market.
The bioanalysis and DMPK studies segment is anticipated to grow at the fastest CAGR of 8.1% over the forecast period. Bioanalysis and DMPK studies are vital in the entire drug development process. Bioanalysis includes Pharmacokinetic (PK) and toxicokinetic tests, which are an integral part of Investigational New Drug (IND)-enabling studies. DMPK studies are conducted in the discovery and development phases of the drug R&D process. According to a report by the Servier Research Institute, 5.2% of overall failures are caused due to issues in preclinical pharmacokinetic testing. Bioanalysis and DMPK studies include in vivo & in vitro studies for preclinical species to overcome challenges arising during the clinical trial phase.
The small animal models segment accounted for the largest revenue share in 2023, owing to the increasing investments in CROs and extensive use of small animals in modern research activities & studies. Small animal models allow research and novel approaches with potential clinical applications in multiple areas. Mice and rats are easier to handle and maintain, have a short life cycle, and are more economical to use than larger animals. They are easy to house, scalable, cost-effective, and amenable to quantitative measures. They can be used to improve the efficiency of animal use while increasing the accuracy of results. Hence, small animal models have proven to be an important tool to take potential therapeutics from preclinical studies to humans.
The organoid models segment is expected to grow at the fastest CAGR from 2024 to 2033. This can be attributed to the increasing number of promising organoid models for drug discovery and development. In cancer research and drug discovery, these are relevant models owing to in vivo conditions; organoids are more biologically relevant to any model system and can manipulate gene sequence and niche components, which has led to rising demand for organoid models. In other diseases, these models have proven to be efficient. For instance, in February 2024, the Charcot-Marie-Tooth Association (CMTA) announced an investment of more than USD 200,000 to develop an organoid model of CMT1A, the common form of this disease. This approach would help scientists evaluate potential treatments that target defects in myelin, which is the protective sheath around peripheral nerves.
The in vivo studies segment accounted for the largest revenue share in 2023. In vivo studies, as part of preclinical research, are continually evolving, driven by technological innovations, scientific discoveries, and the need for more accurate & predictive models. The development of genetically modified animals using techniques such as CRISPR/Cas9 enables researchers to create more precise and disease-relevant models for studying human diseases. These models better mimic the genetic and physiological characteristics of human conditions, leading to more clinically relevant findings.
The imaging technologies segment is expected to grow at the fastest CAGR from 2024 to 2033. Imaging technologies play a crucial role in preclinical CROs by enabling the visualization and analysis of biological processes in living organisms. These technologies help evaluate drug candidates, disease progression, and the development of new therapeutic interventions. Preclinical research is revolutionizing the delivery of modern medicine and the treatment of health issues. Preclinical imaging methods contribute to this transformation by minimizing biological variability and enabling the acquisition of extensive & diverse information while significantly decreasing the number of animals needed for studies, aligning with 3R (Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement) policies.
The biopharmaceutical companies segment accounted for the largest revenue share 75.11% in 2023, owing to the increasing trend of outsourcing services among biopharmaceutical companies lacking expertise in the preclinical phase of drug development. Biopharmaceutical companies can outsource more product innovation due to limited financial resources than traditional pharmaceutical companies. These CROs provide outsourcing services such as preclinical services to biopharmaceutical companies, allowing them to manage their R&D costs and focus on their core competencies.
The medical device companies segment is expected to grow at the fastest CAGR over the forecast period. Commonly offered outsourcing services by CROs to the medical devices sector include clinical development & compliance studies, and regulatory affairs. However, big and specialty CROs offer preclinical services catering to the medical device industry, contributing to this segment’s growth. For instance, CROs such as Charles River Laboratories offer biocompatibility, safety testing, and pathology services in the preclinical stage of drug development. CROs can help save vital time in the trial and development phases of medical devices, enabling increased speed & enhanced success rates for the innovation of new medical devices. Such factors are anticipated to drive the segment growth.
Massachusetts held a significant market share in 2023. This can be attributed to the high presence of pharma companies in the state. For instance, according to the Massachusetts Biotechnology Council, Massachusetts is home to 18 to 20 global pharma firms and ranked as a major state among life sciences companies globally in 2022. Moreover, it remains one of the most NIH-funded states per capita, with USD 3.3 billion, while the Boston area had 26% of Venture Capital (VC) investment nationally. Such a significant presence of pharma companies and high investments have contributed to the market’s growth in the state.
California is expected to witness growth at the fastest CAGR over the forecast period, owing to the increasing clinical trials and research studies in the state. Several state headquartered CROs support research activities through various in vivo and in vitro studies to support the biopharmaceutical and pharmaceutical companies. With constant strategic initiatives, such as innovation and acquisition, the market is anticipated to grow rapidly over the estimated period. For instance, in January 2024, Promedica International, a California Corporation (PMI), an ophthalmology-focused clinical CRO, was acquired by iuvo BioScience. The acquisition is expected to support all aspects of ophthalmic clinical research, leveraging a larger team of experts with centuries of collective experience in ophthalmology.
Some of the key players operating in the market include Laboratory Corporation of America, Eurofins Scientific SE, Charles River Laboratories International, Inc., CROWN bioscience.
U.S. Preclinical CRO Market Top Key Companies:
This report forecasts revenue growth at country levels and provides an analysis of the latest industry trends in each of the sub-segments from 2021 to 2033. For this study, Nova one advisor, Inc. has segmented the U.S. Preclinical CRO market.
By Service
By Model Type
By Technology
By End-use
By State
Chapter 1. Methodology and Scope
1.1. Market Segmentation & Scope
1.2. Segment Definitions
1.2.1. Services
1.2.2. Model Type
1.2.3. Technology
1.2.4. End-use
1.2.5. States
1.2.6. Estimates and forecasts timeline
1.3. Research Methodology
1.4. Information Procurement
1.4.1. Purchased database
1.4.2. nova one advisor internal database
1.4.3. Secondary sources
1.4.4. Primary research
1.5. Information or Data Analysis
1.5.1. Data analysis models
1.6. Market Formulation & Validation
1.7. Model Details
1.7.1. Commodity flow analysis (Model 1)
1.7.2. Approach 1: Commodity flow approach
1.7.3. Volume price analysis (Model 2)
1.7.4. Approach 2: Volume price analysis
1.8. List of Secondary Sources
1.9. List of Primary Sources
1.10. Objectives
Chapter 2. Executive Summary
2.1. Market Outlook
2.2. Segment Outlook
2.2.1. Services outlook
2.2.2. Model Type outlook
2.2.3. Technology outlook
2.2.4. End-use outlook
2.2.5. States outlook
2.3. Competitive Insights
Chapter 3. U.S. Preclinical CRO Market Variables, Trends & Scope
3.1. Market Lineage Outlook
3.1.1. Parent market outlook
3.1.2. Related/ancillary market outlook
3.2. Market Dynamics
3.2.1. Market driver analysis
3.2.1.1. Rising outsourcing trend
3.2.1.2. Increasing focus of life science companies on their core competencies
3.2.1.3. Increasing demand of personalized medicine and advanced therapeutics
3.2.1.4. Increasing pharmaceutical R&D investments
3.2.2. Market restraint analysis
3.2.2.1. Monitoring issues and lack of standardization
3.2.2.2. Managing relationships
3.3. U.S. Preclinical CRO Market Analysis Tools
3.3.1. Industry analysis - Porter’s
3.3.1.1. Supplier power
3.3.1.2. Buyer power
3.3.1.3. Substitution threat
3.3.1.4. Threat of new entrant
3.3.1.5. Competitive rivalry
3.3.2. PESTEL analysis
3.3.2.1. Political landscape
3.3.2.2. Technological landscape
3.3.2.3. Economic landscape
Chapter 4. U.S. Preclinical CRO Market: Services Estimates & Trend Analysis
4.1. Services Market Share, 2023 & 2030
4.2. Segment Dashboard
4.3. U.S. Preclinical CRO Market by Services Outlook
4.4. Market Size & Forecasts and Trend Analyses, 2021 to 2033 for the following
4.4.1. Bioanalysis and DMPK studies
4.4.1.1. Market estimates and forecasts 2021 to 2033
4.4.1.2. In vitro ADME
4.4.1.2.1. Market estimates and forecasts 2021 to 2033
4.4.1.3. In-vivo PK
4.4.1.3.1. Market estimates and forecasts 2021 to 2033
4.4.2. Toxicology testing
4.4.2.1. Market estimates and forecasts 2021 to 2033
4.4.2.2. GLP
4.4.2.2.1. Market estimates and forecasts 2021 to 2033
4.4.2.3. Non-GLP
4.4.2.3.1. Market estimates and forecasts 2021 to 2033
4.4.3. Compound management
4.4.3.1. Market estimates and forecasts 2021 to 2033
4.4.3.2. Process R&D
4.4.3.2.1. Market estimates and forecasts 2021 to 2033
4.4.3.3. Custom synthesis
4.4.3.3.1. Market estimates and forecasts 2021 to 2033
4.4.3.4. Others
4.4.3.4.1. Market estimates and forecasts 2021 to 2033
4.4.4. Chemistry
4.4.4.1. Market estimates and forecasts 2021 to 2033
4.4.4.2. Medicinal chemistry
4.4.4.2.1. Market estimates and forecasts 2021 to 2033
4.4.4.3. Computation chemistry
4.4.4.3.1. Market estimates and forecasts 2021 to 2033
4.4.5. Safety pharmacology
4.4.5.1. Market estimates and forecasts 2021 to 2033
4.4.6. Discovery research
4.4.6.1. Market estimates and forecasts 2021 to 2033
4.4.6.2. Target identification & screening
4.4.6.2.1. Market estimates and forecasts 2021 to 2033
4.4.6.3. Target validation & functional informatics
4.4.6.3.1. Market estimates and forecasts 2021 to 2033
4.4.6.4. Lead identification & candidate optimization
4.4.6.4.1. Market estimates and forecasts 2021 to 2033
4.4.6.5. Preclinical development
4.4.6.5.1. Market estimates and forecasts 2021 to 2033
4.4.6.6. Other associated workflow
4.4.6.6.1. Market estimates and forecasts 2021 to 2033
4.4.7. Others
4.4.7.1. Market estimates and forecasts 2021 to 2033
Chapter 5. U.S. Preclinical CRO Market: Model Type Estimates & Trend Analysis
5.1. Model Type Market Share, 2023 & 2030
5.2. Segment Dashboard
5.3. U.S. Preclinical CRO Market by Model Type Outlook
5.4. Market Size & Forecasts and Trend Analyses, 2021 to 2033 for the following
5.4.1. Small animal models
5.4.1.1. Market estimates and forecasts 2021 to 2033
5.4.1.2. Mice
5.4.1.2.1. Market estimates and forecasts 2021 to 2033
5.4.1.3. Rats
5.4.1.3.1. Market estimates and forecasts 2021 to 2033
5.4.1.4. Rabbits
5.4.1.4.1. Market estimates and forecasts 2021 to 2033
5.4.1.5. Others
5.4.1.5.1. Market estimates and forecasts 2021 to 2033
5.4.2. Large animal models
5.4.2.1. Market estimates and forecasts 2021 to 2033
5.4.2.2. Pig
5.4.2.2.1. Market estimates and forecasts 2021 to 2033
5.4.2.3. Others
5.4.2.3.1. Market estimates and forecasts 2021 to 2033
5.4.3. Organoid models
5.4.3.1. Market estimates and forecasts 2021 to 2033
5.4.4. Cell culture models
5.4.4.1. Market estimates and forecasts 2021 to 2033
5.4.5. Others
5.4.5.1. Market estimates and forecasts 2021 to 2033
Chapter 6. U.S. Preclinical CRO Market: Technology Estimates & Trend Analysis
6.1. Technology Market Share, 2023 & 2030
6.2. Segment Dashboard
6.3. U.S. Preclinical CRO Market by Technology Outlook
6.4. Market Size & Forecasts and Trend Analyses, 2021 to 2033 for the following
6.4.1. In vivo studies
6.4.1.1. Market estimates and forecasts 2021 to 2033
6.4.2. In vitro studies
6.4.2.1. Market estimates and forecasts 2021 to 2033
6.4.3. Ex vivo studies
6.4.3.1. Market estimates and forecasts 2021 to 2033
6.4.4. Imaging technologies
6.4.4.1. Market estimates and forecasts 2021 to 2033
6.4.4.2. Ultrasound imaging
6.4.4.2.1. Market estimates and forecasts 2021 to 2033
6.4.4.3. MRI imaging
6.4.4.3.1. Market estimates and forecasts 2021 to 2033
6.4.4.4. CT imaging
6.4.4.4.1. Market estimates and forecasts 2021 to 2033
6.4.4.5. Radionuclide imaging
6.4.4.5.1. Market estimates and forecasts 2021 to 2033
6.4.4.6. Other imaging technologies
6.4.4.6.1. Market estimates and forecasts 2021 to 2033
6.4.5. Other technologies
6.4.5.1. Market estimates and forecasts 2021 to 2033
Chapter 7. U.S. Preclinical CRO Market: End-use Estimates & Trend Analysis
7.1. End-use Market Share, 2023 & 2030
7.2. Segment Dashboard
7.3. U.S. Preclinical CRO Market by End-use Outlook
7.4. Market Size & Forecasts and Trend Analyses, 2021 to 2033 for the following
7.4.1. Biopharmaceutical companies
7.4.1.1. Market estimates and forecasts 2021 to 2033
7.4.2. Research and academic institutes
7.4.2.1. Market estimates and forecasts 2021 to 2033
7.4.3. Medical device companies
7.4.3.1. Market estimates and forecasts 2021 to 2033
Chapter 8. Competitive Landscape
8.1. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, By Key Market Participants
8.2. Company/Competition Categorization
8.3. Vendor Landscape
8.3.1. List of key distributors and channel partners
8.3.2. Key customers
8.3.3. Key company heat map analysis, 2023
8.4. Company Profiles
8.4.1. Laboratory Corporation of America
8.4.1.1. Company overview
8.4.1.2. Financial performance
8.4.1.3. Product benchmarking
8.4.1.4. Strategic initiatives
8.4.2. Lonza
8.4.2.1. Company overview
8.4.2.2. Financial performance
8.4.2.3. Product benchmarking
8.4.2.4. Strategic initiatives
8.4.3. WuXi AppTec, Inc.
8.4.3.1. Company overview
8.4.3.2. Financial performance
8.4.3.3. Product benchmarking
8.4.3.4. Strategic initiatives
8.4.4. Eurofins Scientific SE
8.4.4.1. Company overview
8.4.4.2. Financial performance
8.4.4.3. Product benchmarking
8.4.4.4. Strategic initiatives
8.4.5. Intertek Group plc
8.4.5.1. Company overview
8.4.5.2. Financial performance
8.4.5.3. Product benchmarking
8.4.5.4. Strategic initiatives
8.4.6. Medpace Holdings, Inc.
8.4.6.1. Company overview
8.4.6.2. Financial performance
8.4.6.3. Product benchmarking
8.4.6.4. Strategic initiatives
8.4.7. Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.
8.4.7.1. Company overview
8.4.7.2. Financial performance
8.4.7.3. Product benchmarking
8.4.7.4. Strategic initiatives
8.4.8. SGA SA
8.4.8.1. Company overview
8.4.8.2. Financial performance
8.4.8.3. Product benchmarking
8.4.8.4. Strategic initiatives
8.4.9. Pharmaceutical Product Development, Inc. (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.)
8.4.9.1. Company overview
8.4.9.2. Financial performance
8.4.9.3. Product benchmarking
8.4.9.4. Strategic initiatives
8.4.10. ICON plc
8.4.10.1. Company overview
8.4.10.2. Financial performance
8.4.10.3. Product benchmarking
8.4.10.4. Strategic initiatives
8.4.11. CROWN bioscience
8.4.11.1. Company overview
8.4.11.2. Financial performance
8.4.11.3. Product benchmarking
8.4.11.4. Strategic initiatives